Home | Sitemap | Links | Set as homepage | Add to favorites Log in - Register now (free)
Search the Site     » Advanced
Sections
Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930
Syndication
Newsletter



Who Is Subject To Jurisdiction Of The United States Military Court Martial?

Spead the word...

May 06,2008 by shab

image

Military Jurisdiction

            Generally, court martial jurisdiction is only exercised over active service members.1 As long as a service member is on active duty, he or she is subject to the UCMJ. Jurisdiction normally ceases when the service member receives a valid discharge certificate. A Reservist is only subject to court martial jurisdiction when the offense was committed while on active duty or in an inactive duty training status. Meanwhile, Army National Guard of Air National Guard personnel are only subject to the federal military justice system while they are performing federal service.2
Worldwide Jurisdiction
            The UCMJ has worldwide jurisdiction.3 The system was designed to travel anywhere the American military deploys. Currently, in Iraq and Afghanistan, courts martial proceedings are conducted in a variety of settings, depending on the space availability and mission requirements. It is not uncommon for a court martial to be conducted in a large tent, or in a dingy building once used by Saddam Hussein’s forces. Depending on the location, court martial participants, except for the defendant, may have their weapons close at hand.
In Cases of Joint Jurisdiction, Who Will Prosecute

            Commonly, both civilian and military courts have jurisdiction over an offense. In this situation, military authorities must coordinate with the state and federal prosecutors to determine who will prosecute. Although rare, a service member may be prosecuted in state court and in military court for the same offense, with certain limitations. However, the U.S. Constitution’s double jeopardy clause protects an accused from being prosecuted in military and federal court for the same offense.4

         Additionally, an American service member may be tried by a foreign country for offenses committed in that country, unless the country has an agreement relinquishing jurisdiction to the United States. Such an agreement is call a status of forces agreement (SOFA). The United States has SOFA agreements with the majority of countries where the nation’s military operates.5
Sources

1.         Articles 2 and 17, U.C.M.J.

2.         Article 3 U.C.M.J.

3.         Article 5, U.C.M.J.

4.         Schlueter, David A., Military Criminal Justice: Practice and Procedure, (6th ed. 2004), at 238-40.

5.         Id. at 241-42.
58 times read

Related news

» What? You leased your car? Why?
by shab posted on Aug 13,2008
» Disadvantages of Barcode Scanners
by shab posted on Jul 04,2008
» West 57th Street by Hilton Club and Pinney’s Estate Nevis
by shab posted on Jul 01,2008
» In France, a Creative Country House
by shab posted on Sep 02,2008
» In London, the Hunt for a Town House
by shab posted on Apr 18,2008
Did you enjoy this article?
(total 0 votes)


More Top News
News
Auto and Trucks
Business and Finance
Computers and Internet
Family
Food and Drink
Health
Home Improvement
Kids and Teens
Legal Matters
Marketing
Online Business
Parenting
Most Popular
Featured Author