Home | Sitemap | Links | Set as homepage | Add to favorites Log in - Register now (free)
Search the Site     » Advanced
Sections
Archive
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930
Syndication
Newsletter



Purple, the Color of a Legal Conniption

Spead the word...

Mar 04,2008 by shab

image

UNTIL last week, the urge to punch purple dinosaurs in the face was entirely passé - sort of like wanting to punt Cabbage Patch Dolls or step on Tickle Me Elmo's windpipe.

Skip to next paragraph Lonni Sue Johnson

Such urges, after all, are excusable only when marketing is at its most shrill. (Let it go, man.)

But the owners of the Barney character have only themselves to blame if Barney-bashing experiences a renaissance - particularly among denizens of the Internet, for whom the character has been an object of gleefully malevolent parody, off and on, since the early days of the Web.

On Wednesday, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital rights group based in San Francisco, filed a lawsuit in Federal District Court in New York against Lyons Partnership of Allen, Tex., which owns the Barney brand.

The group's aim is to bring an end to what it characterizes as the partnership's relentless harassment of Web site owners who parody the Barney character, chiefly through threatening cease-and-desist letters from Lyons's law firm in New York, Gibney, Anthony & Flaherty.

In this case, the foundation, along with the Aiken Gump law firm, is representing Stuart Frankel, a musicologist and freelance computer repair technician in New York who maintains a crude, obscure and inarguably minimalist site claiming that Barney is "the enemy" (dustyfeet.com/evil/enemy.html).

There are, in sum, about 200 cryptic words on the entire page, and two small pictures: one of Barney as he normally appears, and another of Barney defaced, amateurishly, with scribbled-on horns and sharp teeth.

•The site has been up, more or less unchanged, Mr. Frankel said, since 1998. And yet, Mr. Frankel has received at least four cease-and-desist notices - with intimations that his Internet service provider might be contacted, or that further "legal remedies" awaited if he did not remove the images - from one of the Gibney lawyers, Matthew W. Carlin, since 2002. The most recent letter came in June.

The foundation has answered those letters on Mr. Frankel's behalf, pointing out in one response to Mr. Carlin in 2002 that parody is "protected expression under the First Amendment and a recognized exception to both copyright and trademark law." The group also suggested that "making baseless legal threats" was a no-no.

A spokesman from Hit Entertainment, the parent company of Lyons Partnership, would say only that the company would not comment on pending litigation. But it's clear that somewhere in the company's chain of command, there is a failure to grasp the cultural tides that brought Barney and the Web together in the first place.

After all, for all of its success - either as instructive idol or potent child opiate, depending on your point of view - the purple dinosaur exploded onto the American landscape around the same time that the Internet was beginning to permit unprecedented sorts of expression.

So as Barney's signature song "I love you, you love me" (itself, many critics have pointed out, blatantly ripping off the tune to the children's standard "This Old Man") reached an unnerving cultural crescendo, there was on hand a brand new medium in which to indulge the reaction - one that permitted crafty sorts to include not just words but defaced images, mocked-up songs, crude interactive games and other fare.

Wikipedia, the community-edited online encyclopedia, maintains a useful history of anti-Barney Internet humor - from the "Jihad to Destroy Barney," which has evolved into a role-playing game, to fictionalized stories and images documenting Barney's womanizing and crack habit.

Of course, the Web was also channeling animosity toward Barney in the offline culture, too. There was heated debate over whether the dinosaur was doling out sound values or peddling a glassy-eyed catechism that merely sedated children. And those without offspring often found the character at best treacly and at worst enraging.

In a Massachusetts district court in Worcester in 1994, Deborah McRoy testified that she was wearing a Barney costume outside a local pharmacy when Derrick McMahan suddenly tackled her, knocked her giant dinosaur head off and punched her. The Boston Herald reported that when Ms. McRoy asked him why, she said he replied simply, "Because I hate Barney."

When the San Diego Chicken - another costumed creature - introduced a Barney-like character that he would pummel as part of his routine at sporting events, the Lyons company apparently decided that it had had enough, and sued for trademark violation.

12Next Page »
64 times read

Related news

» Housing Aid Advancing in Congress
by shab posted on Apr 13,2008
» Parent Shock: Children Are Not Décor
by shab posted on May 09,2008
» Ideas and Trends Palpitations Over a New Pill for Kids NYTimes.com
by shab posted on Jul 16,2008
» Lawyers Challenged on Asbestos
by shab posted on Sep 01,2008
» Security Check NYTimes.com
by shab posted on Jul 18,2008
Did you enjoy this article?
(total 0 votes)


More Top News
News
Auto and Trucks
Business and Finance
Computers and Internet
Family
Food and Drink
Health
Home Improvement
Kids and Teens
Legal Matters
Marketing
Online Business
Parenting
Most Popular
Featured Author